readme: Add "gj" and "gk" to the rationale
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b31ef5971
commit
352b3581d8
|
@ -132,13 +132,18 @@ The rules are more-or-less sorted by priority.
|
||||||
Many special modes share the same set of similar actions. Those actions should
|
Many special modes share the same set of similar actions. Those actions should
|
||||||
share the same bindings across all modes whenever feasible.
|
share the same bindings across all modes whenever feasible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*** Motion (~[~, ~]~, ~{~, ~}~, ~(~, ~)~, ~C-j~, ~C-k~)
|
*** Motion (~[~, ~]~, ~{~, ~}~, ~(~, ~)~, ~gj~, ~gk~, ~C-j~, ~C-k~)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ~[~ and ~]~: Use ~[-~ and ~]-~ prefixed keys for navigation between sections.
|
- ~[~ and ~]~: Use ~[-~ and ~]-~ prefixed keys for navigation between sections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the mode makes no difference between the end of a section and the beginning
|
If the mode makes no difference between the end of a section and the beginning
|
||||||
of the next, use ~[~ and ~]~.
|
of the next, use ~[~ and ~]~.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- ~gj~ and ~gk~: synonym for ~[~ and ~]~. That's what [[evil-magit][evil-magit]] does.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*Question:* Should ~gj~/~gk~ rather be synonyms for ~C-j~/~C-k~? They cannot
|
||||||
|
emulate the behaviour of ~[]~ or ~][~.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ~C-j~, ~C-k~: If there is granularity, i.e. subsections, use ~C-j~ and ~C-k~
|
- ~C-j~, ~C-k~: If there is granularity, i.e. subsections, use ~C-j~ and ~C-k~
|
||||||
to browse them. This reflects [[evil-magit][evil-magit]] and [[evil-mu4e][evil-mu4e]] default
|
to browse them. This reflects [[evil-magit][evil-magit]] and [[evil-mu4e][evil-mu4e]] default
|
||||||
bindings.
|
bindings.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue